A Growing ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: How Affluence and Hardship Are Found Cheek by Jowl in England.
In Nunsthorpe, inhabitants occupy properties just a few metres from their more affluent neighbours in nearby Scartho village. One 1.8-metre-high wall literally divides the two communities in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, blocking off paths and streets that previously connected them.
“It’s the posh-poor divide,” said Serenity Colley, aged 37. “It’s been like this for as long as I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll bring it down because I suspect they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Data from government statistics reveals how deep disparity often exists, at times across little more than a few metres of tarmac, a line of hedges or a wall. Decades of austerity and lack of funding mean almost two-thirds of councils now contain a neighbourhood classified as one of the poorest in the country.
This geographical widening of poverty has coincided with a significant rise in the number of places where disadvantaged and well-off people find themselves as immediate neighbours. In 2019, only 65 of the most deprived areas bordered one of the wealthiest. This number rose to 119 in the most recent data.
A Barrier Which Does More Than Separate Space
At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the biggest in the country and painfully obvious. The barrier transcends being just a metaphorical divide; it creates tangible problems for daily routines.
- The school commute that ought to take 15-20 minutes become an sixty-minute journey.
- Access to key services like grocery stores, schools and employment centres is made more difficult.
- The area can attract vandalism and loitering, with reports of litter being thrown over the wall and related problems.
“You try to have a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one resident, gesturing towards the rusted metal wall.
Community Spirit Amidst Challenges
At Centre4, staff emphasise that need does not recognise addresses. “Where you live is not a reliable indicator of your level of challenge,” explained director Tracey Good.
Regardless of being placed in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate retains a strong sense and sense of community among its inhabitants. By contrast, the neighbouring area ranks among the most prosperous 10% overall.
Echoes Elsewhere: Stanhope in Ashford
This pattern is mirrored nationally. The Stanhope estate in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s overspill estate, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of neighbourhoods in England. It is closely bordered by large detached homes built in the early 2000s that sit in the wealthiest tenth for job prospects and quality of surroundings.
“They may possess larger properties, but here there’s more community,” said a long-term resident, aged 63. “It’s likely a lot of people over there never even talk to each other.”
The financial gap is clear: an typical three-bedroom house costs about £275,000 on the estate, while on the other side equivalent homes fetch about £410,000.
Residents speak of a palpable feeling of neglect. “Our neighbourhood is neglected,” said holistic health worker Susan Riley-Nevers. “Over here our facilities have gradually disappeared, and most of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.”
The increase in these ‘deprivation divides’ paints a portrait of an ever more segregated society, where prosperity and need are frequently awkwardly close neighbours.