‘It’s heartbreaking’: how thirty captive beluga whales are being used as tools in dispute over animal welfare.
Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an adorable little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but guardian-like companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.
A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been caught in a tussle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and advocacy groups.
But those closest to the whales say the intense debate over their fate often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been carefully observed by the humans who work with them regularly.
After the national authorities blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled attraction near the famous falls where they are kept threatened to end their lives unless the government covers the cost of their survival. Canada’s fisheries minister has refused that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an increasingly precarious situation.
Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals
Experts say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and communal behavior point to they are deeply intelligent mammals – something Kristy Burgess learned directly.
Burgess spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a job that involved building relationships of the sea creatures.
“Building up those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”
Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so amazed by the details and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She developed a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting natures.
“One whale selected me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each altered the way I view bonding.”
Growing Opposition and Facility Decline
Burgess’s connection with the whales developed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their confinement.
During her time at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility ascribes to expected lifespan, but which activists say points to the inadequate care in which they were kept.
The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the closure. “Structural materials is breaking off from the pools because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they take pieces and swim around with fragments in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”
The park did not respond to a request for comment, but earlier claimed: “The whales … obtain far better veterinary services and around the clock attention than any individual in the Britain, or elsewhere.”
Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions
The former employee was fired from the facility in the spring following the death of a beluga, an ailing beluga the park staff had to euthanize. She said the facility thought particulars of the death were leaked to the news outlets and she was fired not long after.
The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left her and staff members in distress. She says the park’s warning to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “considerable personnel”, trucks and specialized tools.
“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.
She backs demands for the whales to be taken promptly from the park, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.
In recent months, Canada’s fisheries minister denied a request to send the whales to China.
“To approve the proposal would have meant a continued existence in enclosure and a reversion to public entertainment,” the minister wrote. “As Canadians, we know that belugas should be in the sea, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing permit an export that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have experienced.”
But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reflect a broader incorrect perception of the facts of existence for belugas raised in confinement.
“The public needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate
As decision makers work to find a solution, suggestions have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Indigenous peoples.
A suggested protected area in the province of Nova Scotia, which recently received official endorsement, has proven contentious. The future location, which includes 100 acres of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Supporters remain hopeful that it could in time represent a sustainable answer for eight of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.
Different voices say the possibility of a sanctuary reflects a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a workable plan in the short term.
An official, director of the initiative, said the facility will simulate the intellectual stimulation and diet the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a much larger space. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|