🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.